The Law with Teens and Nude Photos

firearm 101 October 18, 2012 In Dahlia Lithwicks article Teens, Nude Photos and the up in effect(p)ness, she talks ab aside how teen boys and girls atomic number 18 sending nude plans to their boyfriends or girlfriends. They hire their mobile devices like cell phones, ipod, computers and their cameras to send their nude image. She then addresses the consequences of the nude picture that the teenager has received. The teenager that received the photo basin be ailmentd with a felony of child pornography. The power then discusses why the teenager should not be treated harshly.She states that many of the teenagers are hush up immature and they take for grantedt come the consequences of sending nude photos to each(prenominal) other. In her article she argues that the criminal saveice schema is taking it excessively far in charging the teenagers as child pornographers. I agree with the author because thither is a real problem with criminalizing sexting as a work on of c hild pornography. The teenagers caught with the photo will be supercharged with child pornography. tyke pornography is a just offence and wad stay perpetually on your lifetime record and mess up your life.The majorities of the teenagers that are charged with the crime are not even predators, but a picture like has big consequences if its ever to get verboten on the internet. In my first argument, Dahlia Lithwick states that the teenagers are creation punished to harshly. (Lithwick 492) She is right the charges against them are besides severe. They can stay on their record for a long time or even forever. If the teenager would go tint for a job and they were to pull up his records and they find that he has a child pornography offence, they wont regard to hire him.Who would want to hire a person who takes images of kids? It is a serious offence too people all over the orbit, but its a big charge just for a teen. Especially if that teen is a boy and receives a random photo o n his cell phone and its a nude photo of his girlfriend and she is drunk. Its not his find fault that she is drunk. She is a drunk and underage girl. Teens dont k immediately any break out. Many, salubrious most of the teenagers are all still immature. Many hypothecate that being 18,17,16,15 they think they are grown when they really are not.Most all the teenagers dont hunch forward fully whats right from wrong. There chief is not fully developed and when something goes wrong the kids that think that there grown, go straight to their parents for helper. Thats why they have grown parents to help them in life. Thats why all the judges that prosecuted the teens as child pornographers cant forget that they were too formerly teenagers. The people that make up the criminal justice system cant forget that they once too did stupid things when they were little.At least once they of had to receive on photo of their girlfriend or boyfriend nude. Many of the times the kids do it for fun . They think its being sexy. The kids these days are not the same as the kids from a long time ago. We have so much technology now, that it help us communicate better with people and not be satisfactory to do those things. Dahlia, in her article states We seem to forget that kids can be as tech-savvy as Bill Gates but as unripe as Bambi. (Lithwick 493). She is right, teenagers now a days are tech smart. They know how to handle a phone better than our parents.What teenagers dont stimulate when taking unstable images is that there putting themselves in a bad situations. There can be digital dating violence. They can use those images and put them on profiles like face book. Recently there was a page on face book of girls that are nude. The girls that were put out there were very upset and they wanted the site shut down. They were sensitive at the creator who made the site but it not his fault its the girls who took the images and gave it out. The site was out for a while and a p eople of people got to see it.Right after pretty much the whole world saw it they finally took it down. Now the girls that were seen on the image are now marked for life or for a long time. People that know her will remember that she was in a bad photo. Thats when the teens work out that they did wrong but many still dont learns there lesson. They are still discharge to be doing it because of relationship pressure. Most girls are the ones that are getting taken advantage off. The criminal justice system should change the way they label children as child pornographers.They are just making things worse. They need to find a way a better way to help solve the problem. Labeling children with these names are not going to help it stop. They need to show proof that its actually killing and smart people emotionally. There have been many accounts of teens being depressed because of a bad photo. The system needs to stand up and help out the ones who are victims of these situations. They nee d to label the right people with these labels because teens are not dangerous. The older people can be charged as hild pornographers because they are grown and they know of what they are doing. Those are the only ones they should be charged. everywhere all, Dahlia Lithwick has a point, teens all over are being charged with child pornography for sending and receiving nude photos of their girlfriends. The police said that by sending nude photos girls can put them selves at risk and that has serious consequences so they put a severe consequence on them. They shouldnt label them at a young age just for a nude photo, there teens, they can be immature.