Examining Different Arguments Related to the Choice of a Career Essay

Assessment Part A critic everyy Evaluating an Argument Arts and Sciences (Advantage) Lots of flexibility in c beer choices logically Sound Arts and Sciences (Disadvantage) Leads to a career in food redevelopment Do you want fries with that? Irrational Appeal Education (Advantage) The scoop out way to make a difference in the world logically Sound Education (Disadvantage) Guaranteed low paying job sack the appoint of Proof Nursing (Advantage) People always will need nurses logically Sound Nursing (Disadvantage) Too much schooling (according to Theo, the Law student) Shifting the Burden of Proof learning Systems and Technology (Advantage) No other peak concentration is as innovative (according to Grace) Shifting the Burden of Proof Information Systems and Technology (Disadvantage) Too limited in scope for much development in business situation (according to Ritesh) Logically Sound Business (Advantage) unmeasured career options (according to Ritesh) Logically Sound Business (D isadvantage) Boring work, stuck behind a desk all day Shifting the Burden of Proof Health and piece Services (Advantage) All the benefits of Arts and Sciences, but vastly more focus and relevant Oversimplifying Health and Human Services (Disadvantage) Job options are all in very un-creative domain of a functions. Double StandardAssessment Part B Articulating the Steps Involved in Evaluating an Argument Write out the both most compelling arguments you comprehend that affected your decision. Next, list one that you heard that had a big logical error in it, but which you as yet thought was important.In the IT field, thre is not only a lot of opportunities in that location, from meshwork design, to business systems and technology. There is also a huge demand in that field. The pay range also starts off at a fairly good level. One ofthe arguments I heard is that since I would start at an entry level position, there is a good possibility that I would not get the hours that I am spirit for. Were there all errors in truth with that argument? Describe what those errors were, and what made them errors. There were nearly errors in that truth. There top executive not be such a high demand in my area that I live in. If I were to live in a very desolate area with secondary businesses, there force not be as much prospect as others may permit.What about errors of validity? Remember, these are errors in ratiocination and theyre a little harder to understand Tell me if there are any errors of validity in this argument. I didnt think that there were really any errors in the validity of the argument, however, there are well-nigh things that might not be considered valid by whatsoever. For instance, this field might not be for everyone. Some people might find some enjoyment in it, while others might not like it at all. Revise the argument so that it removes all errors. Restate it in a way that is logically sound. The field can be very promising, allowing you to have the opportunity to make good money.Also, most of the time, there are a high demand for employment, but it also depends on where you are looking for work. Take a look at all of what the job entails, because it might be for you, even though I enjoy it. Take a little more time on this one. What it was that led you to choose this percentage point concentration. Describe both about how you evaluated the arguments and also about what you valued most. I think that the most important point made in these arguments is which field I would enjoy the most. If I have a passion for expert services, then this is probably a good field for me. Also, if the pay home base is accurate, that is a great start at entry level.